Black History,
Culture, Gentrification, Housing, Riesco,
Street Lighting
Croydon’s
Black History
With
the start of Black History Month (BHM) on 1 October Croydon Citizen has
published a posting by me on Reflections on
Croydon’s Black History. http://thecroydoncitizen.com/history/reflections-croydons-black-history.
I
will be interviewed about BHM on Janet Smith’s Culture Show on Croydon Radio on
Sunday 6 October which starts at 2pm. http://croydonradio.com/schedule/show.php?HistoryID=60665546-ac0a-ceab-fbd6-48172b5741db.
Inside
Croydon has chosen to highlight a Croydon BHM event on 29 October about the
history of Caribbean enterprise. http://insidecroydon.com/2013/10/01/pjs-enterprising-look-at-black-history-month-oct-29.
Culture Debate
The
Croydon Arts Debate takes place on 10 October. This event has been organised by
the South Croydon Community Association as a follow-up to its initiative on the
future of the Fairfield Halls and on the need for a community arts strategy. I
have written about the importance of the Debate on Croydon Citizen: http://thecroydoncitizen.com/culture/arts-entertainment/invitation-croydon-arts-debate.
Gentrification
or Community Regeneration
The debate about what the future of Croydon should
be continues in various postings on Croydon Citizen. The latest is one by Gavin
Barwell, MP’s assistant Mario Creatura: ‘The gentrification of Croydon and why
we’re all to blame’ (http://thecroydoncitizen.com/politics/gentrification-croydon-blame). His
analysis is challenged by one of those
posting comments Louis Akindele, which has promoted me to post:
‘Louis
Akindele has hit the nail on the head. Gentrification is a process where by the
less well off are forced out of areas by the better-off. The regeneration
policies being pursued will certainly speed up the gentrification processes.
You only have to look to Wandsworth to see the effects of gentrification over
time, and how those on low incomes and with higher social need have either been
forced to leave the Borough, or been highly concentrated onto the Council
estates. Community regeneration approaches seek to ensure that the less
well-off benefit and are driven away to cheaper areas. That does not mean you
cannot have many of the so-called advantages of gentrification. Culture can be
a tool in community regeneration. If we are to have a socially, as well as
ethnically, diverse Croydon we need policies that concentrate on improving the
socially and economically disadvantaged areas. This will include the need for a
level of controls over the private rented sector whose short-term lettings
create rapid turnover of residents, meaning there are not enough people putting
down roots and helping to develop their neighbourhood community. The Council should focus on looking for
developers who are not just in it for the maximum profit, but understand community regeneration needs and
want to help meet them. It will need to ensure that rental values on retail are
not pushed up beyond the ability of local shopkeepers to pay. The new Cabinet
housing plan adopted on 30 September does not understand the contradictions
involved in regeneration between gentrification and community. It is therefore
in danger of helping to speed up the former at the expense of the latter.’
Meeting Housing
Needs
Croydon
Council is reported to be in trouble over its treatment of homeless families – http://insidecroydon.com/2013/09/29/council-faces-massive-compensation-bill-over-housing-failings.
Croydon
has a high incidence of homelessness, a large unstable private rented sector, a
lack of affordable housing. To be fair to the Tories they have been trying to
grapple with these problems. Earlier in the year I attempted dialogue through
the Scrutiny Committee process but as I was ignored I submitted several Freedom
of Information requests. I posted the answers on earlier postings on this bog
site so that more people in Croydon have access to the detail.
The
Council Cabinet has now approved (30
September) a five year housing delivery plan based on the following principles:
-
optimising the development of new homes;
-
bringing empty homes back into use;
-
creating pathways to home ownership;
-
developing a quality private rented sector;
-
supporting the development of affordable housing;
-
ensuring the Council’s planning framework and policies continue to facilitate
positive residential growth;
-
developing a strong sense of place and high quality neighbourhoods.
The
Cabinet paper states that the plan’s’ ambitious housing growth targets will
only be achieved through the combined
efforts of all housing development and delivery partners across sectors.’
The Council proposed to set up a Croydon Housing Congress to meet about three
times year bringing ‘together of all
these partners including funders, developers, landowners, registered providers,
community housing organisations,
agents, architects, consultants and builders, with the Council.’
It
proposes to develop a Croydon Council Housing Investment Fund ‘in the form of a
revolving fund, possibly in partnership
with other bodies. The Council will use its’ borrowing powers, income base,
assets and the strength of the local authority’s covenant, to help provide
necessary financing for investment in stalled sites where viability cannot
otherwise be achieved, in return for repayment contributions over time.’
It
plans to encourage more conversion of redundant office blocks into residential,
like the current
St.
George’s House (288 homes); Quest House (73 ‘affordable homes’); and St. Anne’s
House. The
Council thinks that there ‘is potential for such schemes to produce more than
900 apartments within
the metropolitan centre and over 150 in the district centres.’ An Immediate action is therefore to identify and appraise
priority office conversions schemes.
It
also envisages unlocking stalled sites in the 9 District Centres and London
Road, ‘to deliver significant regeneration benefits potentially including: more
than 800 new homes; new supermarkets and a variety of other retail units; new
leisure facilities; improved streetscapes.’
Over
150 empty properties have already been brought back into use in 2012/13. The
Council estimates that '285 homes in the borough have been empty for more than
twelve months and the Council is
working innovatively with different partners, including private landlords,
registered providers and Community Interest Companies, to bring these back into use.’
‘107
sites have been identified to provide some level of affordable housing. The
Council will continue to develop its new build programme and work with the GLA,
registered providers and private developers to maximize affordable provision,
including within the metropolitan centre.’
Unfortunately
the Council sees the ‘private rented
sector as representing a major opportunity for housing growth.’ It aims ‘to create a high quality
sector providing an attractive tenure across the borough delivering new homes
suitable for a range of incomes; balancing investors’ ability to take revenue
and a share in capital return with maintaining affordability. Croydon’s current
relatively low cost position, coupled with its potential for very strong
growth, makes it uniquely attractive to this sector across the whole of London.’
The
full report can be seen at https://secure.croydon.gov.uk/akscroydon/images/att2641.pdf.
The Riesco
Collection Sale
Rather
than wait to be expelled from the Museums Association the Council has decided
to resign. Full details at
www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/10708022.Croydon_Council_resigns_from_Museum_Association_over_Riesco_row;
and at http://insidecroydon.com/2013/10/02/the-riesco-resignation-doesnt-pollard-read-his-mail.
Street
Lighting
I
am delighted to be able to report that the Council and Skanska agreed to re-site two street lamps from
front garden boundaries to near the kerb in Oakhill Rd. This follows a long
string of emails leading to a meeting of three residents and Maggie Mansell,
one of the local Councillors, and further emailing to clarify the exact nature
of what was agreed. This finally
resulted in another meeting in the street to resolve outstanding concerns.
These discussions involved John Algar of the Council and Paul Burnham of Skanska.
What
the exercise has shown is that there is room for flexibility on siting new
street lighting columns. Our concerns was mainly about light intrusion into
front bedrooms from the new columns being sited on front garden boundaries.
A
number of wider issues have emerged from the discussions that potentially
relate to every other street waiting to have new lighting columns installed.
The
markings for siting new columns may not be accurate. So for example the
re-siting in Oakhill Rd were not 0.45m from the kerb edge as they should have
been, but further into the pavement including over a utility trench. Skanksa
needs to ensure that its markings are accurate to avoid misunderstandings by
residents about siting.
The
notice delivered to residents needs to be clearer about what is involved, the
measurements for placing columns, and making it clear that residents with
concerns should contact the Council to see whether there is any room for
flexibility.
The
particular characteristics of a street are not necessarily fully understood by
the specialist company that does the survey and drawings for Skanska. For
example for Oakhill the traffic flow and parking problems in relation to
Skanksa’s vehicle during the installation process had been were underestimated.
There
needs to be improved co-ordination on works between the street lighting team
and the street repairs team. Two parts of small pavement repair work undertaken
a few weeks earlier in Oakhill had to be dug up into order to install the new
columns. It would be better if those repairs could be timetabled to be
completed after the columns have been installed, and the old columns taken out.
The
next meeting of the Street Lighting Joint Committee is being held on Wednesday
16 October at 5.30pm at the Town Hall. To see the agenda when it is posted up
go to https://secure.croydon.gov.uk/akscroydon/users/public/admin/kabmenu.pl?cmte=SJC.
No comments:
Post a Comment