Thursday 15 June 2023

A New Future for Culture in Croydon – Does The Borough of Croydon Programme Meet The Challenge?

 In July 2014 the newly elected Labour Council held a Culture Seminar to discuss its vision for culture. There had already been discussions in the Croydon Arts Network in response to the debate initiated by South Croydon Community Association on the future of Fairfield Halls.

I produced a discussion paper A New Future for Culture in Croydon. Nine years later we have the Borough of Culture programme. In it I argued that ‘Of course no one should be under any illusions that the Council will be able to provide money from a stretched budget which will get tighter and tighter under further central government cut backs from 2015/16. It is the change of attitude towards culture that is important. Labour will need to convince cultural activists that a shift in attitude will contribute to creating a greater sense of cultural activities being valued, genuinely encouraging community groups and representatives to collaborate, and finding creative ways to support their initiatives.’

The basis of the Borough of Culture was created by the Labour Council and inherited by the Executive Mayor who had been a member of the pre-2014 Conversative administration. None of the measures I suggested for reversing the Tory damage were implemented by Labour.

I suggested that two very important aspects of culture should be reflected in any overarching Vision statement.

·        development of people's skills and talents to their fullest potential

·        broadening people's intellectual and creative horizons.

 I discussed various aspects of culture, including heritage as culture, town and local centres, educational and training institutions, community cohesion and diversity, the cultures of health, physical activity and sports, musical and arts heritage, culture and recession, the concept of ‘spiritual capital’, heritage and culture of BME and newer settlers, racism, public history, the history of mutuality, protecting the built environment, the limits of the Digital World, and heritage objectives for cultural strategy.

If any of this has any continuing validity, it may be helpful is assessing whether the Borough of Culture programme has met the challenges.

The Discussion Paper

We're ambitious for Croydon with a vision to see the borough established as a genuine destination for both visual and performing arts. We have some great spaces for exhibitions, theatre, music and dance and we have a wealth of local talent plus the opportunity to build on what we already have to ensure we have a vibrant, exciting and diverse cultural offering that is attractive to people from across Croydon and further afield. Nobody is pretending this will be an easy task to achieve, but we're absolutely determined to unlock Croydon’s potential over the next few years.’ - Councillor Timothy Godfrey, Cabinet member for Culture, Leisure and Sport - June 2014.

The future of culture in Croydon is much brighter now that Labour is in control of the Council. It brings to an end the Tory ‘Know the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing’ cultural vandalism approach in which for 2013/14 they deliberately planned to disengage from cultural activities.

Meanwhile a range of cultural initiatives have been taken by community groups and cultural practitioners, inc. the establishment of the Croydon Arts Network, the Croydon Fun Palace Project, Matthews Yard as a commercial venue, the David Lean Cinema Campaign, the Stanley People’s Initiative, the resurrection of Warehouse Theatre at Fairfield Halls, the Croydon Heritage Festival, with supporting debate through Croydon Citizen and Croydon Radio. 2012 saw a year long festival to commemorate the death of Croydon’s black composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor. There are the community festivals such as those in South Norwood, Purley and Thornton Heath.

Cabinet Culture, Leisure and Sport member Timothy Godfrey’s initiative in holding the seminar on Tuesday 8 July is an important first step in allowing people across the whole cultural (inc. heritage) scene in Croydon to engage in constructive dialogue on the way forward.

Councillor Godfrey and his deputy, Oliver Lewis, will use the evening to encourage those attending to share their own views and generate new ideas. These will be built into a plan which is being developed with a view to boosting the range and quality of cultural events staged in the Borough. There will be presentations from speakers representing the existing diverse cultural offer in the borough in addition to a frank and open opportunity to listen to Croydon residents and organisations.

Financial Realities

Of course no one should be under any illusions that the Council will be able to provide money from a stretched budget which will get tighter and tighter under further central government cut backs from 2015/16.

It is the change of attitude towards culture that is important.

Labour will need to convince cultural activists that a shift in attitude will contribute to creating a greater sense of cultural activities being valued, genuinely encouraging community groups and representatives to collaborate, and finding creative ways to support their initiatives. 

Reversing the Tory Damage

There are several things that need to be done to reverse some of the damage caused by the former Tory administration.

  • ·     The adoption of a resolution stating the Council will not sell any more Riesco Collection items, will re-think the way the Collection is displayed, and re-open the former investigation into setting up a trust for the Collection.
  • ·     Renegotiation of the Section 106 money taken over by the Council to invest back in Warehouse Theatre.
  • ·     Reversal of the cut to the Schools Music budget.
  • ·     Reversal of the decision to build on part of Queens Gardens.
  • ·     Re-negotiation of the library service contract to ensure that libraries develop improved cultural activities programmes.
  • ·     Re-enabling public access to all the materials on open shelves in the former Local Studies room.

Labour’s Cultural Strategy 2006

 

‘Concentrating cultural activities housed within historic buildings, attractive open space

along with restaurants, cafes, bars and shops is seen as a way of reinforcing Croydon’s popular appeal –

 balancing commercial and architectural progress with entertainment and public participation.’

– Tony Newman, Council Leader up to May 2006;

and now Leader again commenting the ‘Be inspired’ cultural strategy 2005-2008.

How much of the previous Labour administration’s ‘Be inspired’ cultural strategy 2005-2008 is still relevant and feasible to implement:

  • ·     More facilities for young people such as multi-use games areas and children’s entertainment in parks
  • ·     More traditional pubs, outdoor cafés and family-friendly restaurants
  • ·    Safer, cleaner parks and open spaces
  • ·     Improved borough-wide sports and exercise facilities for all ages
  • ·     Opportunities for a more varied programme of entertainment including theatre, live music, classical concerts and cultural activities helping to celebrate cultural diversity
  • ·     Encouraging open-air markets, small independent shops and creative businesses
  • ·     New studio/exhibition space in the borough, supporting local artists
  • ·      A new jazz café in Surrey Street
  • ·     Investigating funding sources to redevelop Ashburton and Thornton Heath libraries

The Tory Years

Has Labour tracked what happened to its plan during the Tory years?

How much of the above has been achieved by the Tories, made irrelevant for the future, and will Labour still wish to continue endorse? Have the Tories achieved anything positive? After all large scale cuts were not required in their first two years because the world recession caused by the banking system had not happened. What elements of the Labour plan did the Tories decide not to implement and for what reason, or did they absorb some aspects into their changing plans?

Tracking what happened and the changing approach is difficult. For example the Croydon Cultural Partnership group within the Local Strategic Partnership (the LSP) was renamed the Croydon Development and Cultural Partnership by the Tories. Although it is listed on the Croydon On-line website there is no link to detail about it, unlike with the three other themed sub-partnerships of the LSP. www.croydononline.org/get_involved/local_strategic_partnership. In fact it appears that the Strategic Partnership and its themed partnerships are held behind closed doors.

A Vision for Culture

Two very important aspects of culture should be reflected in any overarching Vision statement.

  • development of people's skills and talents to their fullest potential
  • broadening people's intellectual and creative horizons.


A Draft Vision Statement

We would like everyone to have the opportunity to participate in a variety of cultural activities which will: help them develop their skills and talents to their fullest, broaden their intellectual and creative horizon; increase their well being; promote community engagement and cohesion through an appreciation of Croydon’s diversity, and; foster a sense of place and belonging within the neighbourhoods and communities of the borough, and contribute to protecting and celebrating the past as reflected in the local built and open space environment.


Heritage as Culture

Croydon’s development has been a complex process of social, economic, cultural and political engagement, including conflict, compromise and consensus.

Town and Local Centres

Promotion of an individual identity and sense of place in the Borough’s town and local centres can provide a foundation for future vitality and viability. This concept seems to be increasingly recognised as of growing importance. However, whether people want to take advantage of cultural activities in the centres will depend on what is on offer, the ease of public transport and car parking and the feeling of safety especially at night. The quality of the built environment can play an important role here, with the need to preserve the best of the historic environment, the improvement of run-down buildings, and the replacement of redundant buildings by good quality human-scale new developments. The need for a mixed economy of residential, small and larger businesses and leisure facilities will require the Council's planners to ensure that no centre becomes over dominant by one type of activity.

Educational and Training Institutions

These institutions can be 'ghettoes' only catering for their students  without vibrant interaction with the local communities around them. Discussion is needed with each institution to see what more they can do to open up activities to the wider public, including use and hire of facilities, courses, exhibitions, dramatic and music performances, and taking their cultural 'products' around the Borough.

Community Cohesion and Diversity

One of the most difficult aspects of cultural strategy relates to its contribution to community cohesion and diversity. The cultural diversity of the Borough's residents from different national and ethnic backgrounds is showcased in various ways throughout the year. However, events do not necessarily attract large audiences from other national or ethnic groups. A good diverse attendance, however, does not mean that people attending will talk with each other, as most people find interacting with strangers difficult. There are no easy answers to how to encourage people to meet each other across different national and ethnic divides. It needs the small core of event organisers to make the effort to introduce people to each other and facilitate conversation. The occasions which offer the most potential are:

  •        Festival events, especially those based in parks and open spaces.
  •        Street festivals serving a small number of streets or an estate are excellent ways of beginning to encourage neighbours to meet and get to know each other better.
  •       Multi-faith cultural activities, especially as many faith groups have diverse national and ethnic congregations.
  •       Community Centres putting on events in which different user groups showcase their activity.
  •       Re-packaging School Fetes and Bazaars as Neighbourhood Festivals to attract non-parents.

Festival organisation is not easy and requires a reasonable level of funding for core organisational costs, as well as meeting all the costs relating to venue and equipment hire, health and safety, licences, as well as paying for performers.

The Cultures of Health, Physical Activity and Sports

Most adults will not be interested in participating in hard and elite sports. Many more may be encouraged into soft sports and games. For many walking may be more inviting, which can also involve families and people in wheelchairs. More attention could be given to supporting 'healthy walking' through heritage and open space walks with a learning component. e.g. local history, ecology. This may need the development of a programme for the payment of experienced heritage and ecology leaders for walks.

Sports are a part of cultural activity. A wider cultural interest in sport can be encouraged through the Borough's rich sports heritage especially those activities run by the large number of mutual, community and voluntary groups over the last two hundred years, the amateur sports organisations, and the role of sport and games activities in parks.

Musical and Arts Heritage

Similarly work on the history of music and music making and arts and arts manufacturing in the Borough can add a new dimension to understanding local cultural heritage. It can also inspire the production of new cultural works. The Croydon Samuel Coleridge-Taylor Festival in 2012 showed what can be achieved.

Culture and Recession

It is difficult to assess what effect the economic recession has been having on cultural activities. Certainly there has been:

  •       reduced funding from local and central government, cultural agencies and charitable trusts
  •       reduced surplus income meaning fewer people can afford to take part in cultural activities as              audiences
  •       increased entertainment and leisure activities in the home.

 On the other hand there may be greater demand:

  •         for involvement in cultural activities to ensure increased levels of enjoyment
  •         to develop skills in cultural activities to give people an interesting hobby or to develop income generation or to increase chances in job prospects when the economy improves.

Cultural strategy can be linked in with regeneration and neighbourhood renewal strategies. Such strategies talk about ‘social’, economic’, ‘environmental’ and ‘social exclusion’, and ‘social’, economic’ and ‘environmental’ capital. Yet the fear of crime, the general decay of the state of the local environment, the lack of prospects, can all have adverse effects on individuals’ sense of well-being and mental health. The experience of social exclusion or the onset of sudden crises, whether economic or health, can adversely affect the way people feel. The constant experience of negative material conditions has an adverse effect on the human spirit. We should also be talking about ‘spiritual capital’. This not the same as the religious concept of ‘spirituality’. A non-religious example is the conclusion of longitudinal historical medical research from the United States that the more intellectually stimulated very old people remain, the healthier they remain.

The sections of the population most likely to be adversely affected by a general low level of 'spiritual capital’ and be particularly further disadvantaged by the economic recession, the cuts to benefits, the lack of a London Living Wage, and the no guaranteed hours work contracts, are those in lower and fixed income groups, and those who are socially isolated because of economic and cultural reasons. Therefore an important element in developing a Cultural Strategy may be encouraging cultural activities which enable participation on a free or very low cost basis. To identify those most likely to benefit will require careful discussion with a range of other organisations, especially community and voluntary groups.

Heritage and Culture of BME and Newer Settlers

Many of the newer communities settling in the Borough are comprised of children, teenagers and young adults. The Strategy should include a statement about ‘working with people from all communities', and that ‘work with older people is particularly important to ensure their reminiscences are recorded and not lost.'

One of the important ways in which different communities and groups can be engaged more in the Borough's heritage is by ensuring that there is an emphasis on exploring what are called 'hidden histories': working class, women, religious minorities, Welsh, Scots and Irish, and Black, Asian and other ethnic and national minorities in Britain. It takes a lot of research and advocacy to uncover ‘hidden histories’. In respect of the history of Black and Asian peoples in Britain, the door has being opening. The Croydon Radical History Network has begun to build on the previous good work undertaken in Croydon several years ago. The talks I give on Samuel Coleridge-Taylor introduce listeners to the contribution of Black visitors and residents in Britain and their networks, as well as the influence of Black music. 

Racism

Part of the social glue function of community organisations should be to build a common sense of justice, understanding, and positive interaction between all the different sub-groups and interests within neighbourhood communities. There needs to be activity that brings people together, especially in those areas adversely affected by racism and ethnic segregation. One way is through cultural diversity and heritage activity.

Across different curricular areas the education system as a whole has failed to fully reflect the contribution that Black and Asian and other ethnic minorities have made to Britain's development.

A key element in fostering community cohesion, tackling existing racism, and trying to reduce the number of racists who develop in their childhood and youth, should be to improve the degree of knowledge and understanding of the Black and Asian historical presence and contribution to the development of British society over the last five hundred years. This needs to be celebrated in its own right, as well as be an integral part of the way in which people understand British history. The growing hostility to new arrivals, especially East Europeans, shows the need to undertake similar work on Britain’s past interactions with, and the contribution made by previous settlers, from that part of the world.

Public History

‘Public History’ at local level encompasses such activities as:

  •               the celebration by the residents of an anniversary of the building of their estate
  •               the anniversary of an important building or neighbourhood
  •               the fight to save built environment heritage
  •               an emphasis on the lives of ordinary people
  •               an emphasis on the role ordinary people and their organisations have played in                                shaping their area
  •               a re-imaging of British history to include women, the working class, black and ethnic                    minorities and other excluded groups

'Public history’ is a development on from work on separate 'hidden histories' enabling connections to be made between them. All historical specialisms and approaches are useful routes into the historical picture. The challenge is to integrate them so that a more holistic and inclusive story of the past is told.

 

Work on ‘Public History’ is important because it helps to inform ordinary people, and community organisations struggling to obtain improvements in their neighbourhoods today, that they are heirs of a long tradition of ordinary working people creating organisations to meet particular needs, and engaging in collective activity to influence their lives and lobby for economic, political and social inclusion and justice.

The History of Mutuality

Another area of 'hidden history' are the mutual collective organisations for political, social and economic inclusion, justice and improvement: the fraternal, friendly, loan, building and co-operative societies, trade unions, and today’s community and voluntary groups. Fraternal and mutual organisations:

  • provided a glue that linked people together at work, and because work and home were often close, between work and community
  • built an infrastructure of social welfare and income support in the absence of a Welfare State
  • were seedbeds for building experience in running organisations and in participative and representative democracy
  • forced a response that made Britain more inclusive in electoral politics, and moderated the worst effect of economic forces through social and employment reform

 

Protecting the Built Environment

 

Large numbers of people wish to protect and celebrate the past as reflected in their local built and open space environment. The work of amenity societies and other organisations in popularising and campaigning on this should be acknowledged. The loss of pubs in recent years, especially to local supermarket retailers’ stores, has raised the question of what more the Council can do to use a wide range of powers to protect those that are valued by their local communities. Other ways to protect valued and interesting components of the built environment may need to be examined though the listing of buildings of local interest, assessing whether Conservation Area policies are being properly adhered to, and seeking Grade II listing status for buildings. A further way to mark the important of particular buildings is through a programme of plaques to commemorate interesting people, organisations and businesses by the Council and community and specialist organisations.

 

The Limits of the Digital World

A lot of cultural activity depends on publicity through digital means: email, Facebook, Twitter and websites. But this is dependent on people knowing about them in the first place. Many people I have spoken to at my history stalls do not know about the web based Croydon Citizen (CC), Inside Croydon (IC) or Croydon Radio (CR). This means that the information and debates on them are not reaching everyone who is potentially interested. This is only in relation to people with access to the web. There are large numbers of people who do not have home or mobile access to the web and have to use their local library or internet café. 

This digital divide between the connected and the unconnected has been a challenge for Government and the regulator Oftel/Ofcom for nearly 15 years. It is an issue that can have solutions at local level. For example, when local authorities installed entry-phone systems it was possible to have provided phone and internet access at the same time, but this usually did not happen. I hope that Croydon Tech City will explore how local digital businesses can help come up with local solutions. Perhaps the Council should consider funding overcoming digital divide projects using Community Infrastructure Levy monies paid by developers. 

Heritage Objectives for Cultural Strategy

As well as stating a vision (see above) a Cultural Strategy will need to set out key objectives. These could be ones related to the heritage component.

  • Promote the histories of working class people, children, women, the disabled, religious minorities, Welsh, Scots and Irish, and Black, Asian and other ethnic and national minorities in Croydon.
  • Promote the Borough’s historical connections with different European nationalities, especially those from Eastern Europe and the Balkans.
  •  Promote the histories of community, faith, mutual and voluntary activity and their roles in developing, democratic participation, political, social and economic inclusion, and community cohesion.
  • Develop ways in which teachers and pupils can be supported to use cultural, local history and heritage material to illustrate topics they are exploring, including Citizenship, English Literature, Religious Studies, History, music and art, and Geography.
  • Provide support to schools to increase their ability to undertake activities in the classroom related to special cultural and historical commemorations.

 Where Next?

This discussion paper is a contribution to the debate that has already been going on among Croydon culture activists, and which will heat up as a result of the 8 July seminar called by Councillor Timothy Godfrey. A draft cultural strategy will emerge and go through the Council decision making system. Hopefully the draft will be looked at by the revised Scrutiny and Oversight Committee procedures, giving cultural activists the chance to submit verbal and written comments. Because of the importance of linking culture to regeneration and to ‘spiritual capital’ cultural strategy will need to be looked at by the Fairness Commission Labour is setting up. The existence of a new Council Cultural Strategy does not mean that there is no need for an independent community cultural strategy as has been discussed in debates in the formation of the Croydon Arts Network. The whole range of independent cultural activists need  their own joint perspective which will strengthen their interaction with the development and implementation of the Council strategy.

No comments:

Post a Comment