The
row over Ruskin College’s archives, records and artefacts has been continuing
with Hilda Keen’s latest views being circulated around the enetworks (http://hildakean.com) and a former student at
the College posting a piece on the History Workshop Journal website: www.historyworkshop.org.uk/thoughts-questions-of-a-ruskin-graduate-on-the-college-archives.
.
1)
What further clarifications are needed from the College?
2)
What is the goal we are trying to achieve: a personal vendetta against
the Principal, or learn the lessons, have a good future for the College, and
ensure that the University world thinks carefully about its archive and student
record policies?
I
have now received further clarification from Professor Mullender as follows:
Denis
Pakeman refers to a number of pieces of memorabilia. The Bowerman plaque was
the sole piece we held about him and it has gone on loan to join an entire
display about him and his union at the Marx Memorial Library where it makes
much more sense. The Raphael Samuel portrait and photograph went with the half
of his archive that we held, which made perfect sense. We deliberated long and
hard about loaning our holdings to the Bishopsgate Institute but Hilda’s own
research assistant told me that he had to read everything twice because the
collection was split and made so much less sense in that form, the clincher
being that he found one letter that had one page in London and one with us. He
was on a year’s full-time funding but I can’t imagine many other researchers
being able to duplicate their reading of an archive just because of the
eccentric way it was held. It must also be owned that the Bishopsgate, with its
funded archivist, is better able to catalogue and promote the material than we
are, to the benefit of scholars. It is often forgotten, but we are a working
college and we are funded to serve our learners, first and foremost. The GB
Shaw portrait was not ours and I returned it to its rightful owners, the Labour
Party. Can it please be acknowledged that I found this lost painting, had
someone from Canada confirm that this was the case and have this week had a
most handsome congratulation from a Shaw scholar in Ireland. The Kitson mural
is going to South Africa, by special request, and we naturally retain the
commemorative plaque to David Kitson as an Honorary Fellow of our college. If
the past is no longer wanted at Ruskin, as Denise alleges, why have I spent so
much of my own money on repairing and framing photographs and other items for
display, why have I spent whole days with removers and premises staff bringing
memorabilia to our newly consolidated site and embellishing the new Boardroom,
reception area, two trade union studies areas and so on with our wonderful
collections? I am particularly glad to get the chance to comment again on the
miners’ strike banner which Hilda Kean characterised as being displayed on a
corridor leading to a toilet. It is actually the corridor leading to the Common
Room in our flagship trade union studies centre, where coffee is served and
evenings are spent. There happens to be a toilet next to the Common Room, which
is probably not an uncommon juxtaposition, given the aforementioned coffee. The
banner is large, the wall-space was perfect and the users of the building are
much enjoying its highly appropriate presence. I would hazard a guess that, in
its former home in our own library, folk relatively rarely glanced at it. It is
now in solitary glory and much better displayed, in my opinion. We have also
been able to give prominence to photos taken over a period of a century and a
half, portraits and other memorabilia in our new home. Further, we have kept
the working class visual tradition alive by helping to design and make a
three-storey mosaic with a mosaic artist and participants in a series of WEA
classes locally.
We
are not a museum or a public library and we do not employ an archivist. One set
of papers we held was never consulted while it was with us but has been
constant use since it was married up with a whole family of papers at the
People’s History Museum, on loan from us. We care about a living, learning
present drawing upon the lessons of the past. Because we really care, we share
our riches with other collections and we retain only those we can truly care
for and truly make useful to others.’
Student (and Staff)
Records
As
has been pointed out to me by a local authority archivist the question of the
preservation or not of student records is the same one faced by any employer
re- its staff records, or indeed a local authority social services department
re-clients or a school re-pupils. I have been in local authority archives
recently at which enquirers have been told personal information on pupils is
subject to a 100 year rule. The Records
Management Society has issued guidance on the retention of records for local
authorities and schools, supported by documents such as a toolkit for schools.
The archivist wonders whether there is similar guidance issued for
Universities.
Another
archivist has drawn my attention to several matters which I have drawn Prof
Mullender’s attention to. The ICO/SoA (now ARA) has a Code of Conduct on Data
Protection. JISC has guidance on Records Management aimed at the Higher
Education sector. Ruskin College may be classed as a Public Authority under the
Freedom of Information Act and therefore its corporate records may well also be
classed as public records. The archivist stresses that it is possible to deposit
records containing sensitive personal information with an archive and find a
solution to deal with Data Protection subject access requests from living
individuals or their legal representatives. Archives are doing this on a
frequent basis – such requests are few and once an individual is deceased then
DP is no longer relevant. There are a lot of college heads who have
successfully implemented records management and archive procedures for their
records. In Oxford several archivists/records managers should be available for
advice
and for a small and lasting impact. Finally the archivist suggests that the College might consider developing a retention schedule for its own records from a records manager on a consultancy basis.
and for a small and lasting impact. Finally the archivist suggests that the College might consider developing a retention schedule for its own records from a records manager on a consultancy basis.
What Should Be Done Now?
With
all the concern about what has happened at Ruskin and the obvious interest in
the history and tradition of working class education, including its independent
strand from the Plebs League to the National Labour Colleges, the time is right
for several things to be done, especially by academics:
·
Go to the Open Day if you can and see the new building and the
Library.
·
Spread the word about Ruskin’s far-reaching educational opportunities
for those with few or no qualifications (see www.ruskin.ac.uk
).
·
Return to the principles and values behind the original History
Workshop movement, and develop of a new network to promote them.
·
Support the Independent Working
Class Education Project, which meets again on 24 November at The Northern
College in Barnsley.
·
Initiate debates in every College and University about the future of
their archives and student records.
·
Stimulate a national debate about the relationship between data
protection and the retention of material that may be considered of historical
interest.
(1)
Anne Summers Editorial Blog on the crisis facing archives can be read
on www.historyworkshop.org.uk/archives-a-house-on-fire.
In it she mentions the new Campaign for Voluntary Sector Archives. www.voluntarysectorarchives.org.uk.
(2)
See my blog pieces:
a.
‘The Abolition of MLA: Is Part of Wuider Threat to Inclusive Heritage?
(August 2010): http://historyandsocialaction.blogspot.co.uk/2010/08/abolition-of-mla-is-part-of-wider.html.
o ‘The Threat to Archives and Records’ in
December 2010: http://historyandsocialaction.blogspot.co.uk/2010_12_01_archive.html.
o Sing Along with Peggy
Seeger: Taking Ruskin College Forward and the Future of Archives (October
2012): http://historyandsocialaction.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/sing-along-with-peggy-seeger-taking.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment